Archive for the 'conferences' Category



we r in yr dormz, hlpn yr rsrch: metrolina info lit conference

Tomorrow we are headed to Charlotte for Metrolina’s 6th Annual Information Literacy Conference. Metrolina is the regional professional organization for librarians in the Charlotte metro area. A few of us from UNCG try to attend every year and it has never disappointed. This year Jenny Dale and I are presenting on information literacy outside of the library walls (slides are below), while Amy Harris, Kathy Shields, and I will be “presenting” a poster on our reference intern program. Kathy Crowe and Amy also have a presentation on our Information Literacy Council. It is like UNCG just exploded all over Charlotte. Good times to come along with conference notes.

What happens in a room full of data professionals? Awesome sauce…

And IASSIST. I love my data peeps in the International Association for Social Sciences Information Services and Technology, even if the ridiculously long name almost got me turned away from the Canadian border (“Sorry, customs officer lady, it simply doesn’t roll off the tongue”). IASSIST’s annual conference was in the lovely city of Vancouver and it was simply the best IASSIST ever. I was pretty busy this year and didn’t have the concentration to take great notes. Plus, there is always SO MUCH information that it can be hard to process things quickly.

Here are some major ideas/take-away points:

  • The conference kicked off with a kick butt workshop on survey creation with Tom Lindsay and Andrew Sell of the University of Minnesota. They started by reminding us we needed to step back from the creation of the survey instrument to think critically about the research question we have in mind. Only with that pre-thinking are we able to create an instrument that will be viable. It was an excellent workshop with lots of information. If you are interested in more information, email me and I can put you in touch with the masters!
  • Joe Hurley from Georgia State University talked about his use of UN publications as gateway/intro resources for non-data savvy users. He trained other librarians at his university on UN resources and you can check out his great libguide.
  • A group of data citation ninjas had a great session on data citation. I couldn’t capture everything, but I will link to their slides once they become available. Part of what made it a great session was the inclusion of a scientist in the mix, Heather Piwowar of DataONE, which aims to preserve access to science data. Hailey Mooney and Mark Newton did a fabulous study of the data citation practices and guidance in various citation style guides. Their matrix of specific elements was pretty complex so I’m looking forward to getting their slides.
  • Our data guru, Chuck Humphrey, talked about the research data infrastructure and IASSIST’s place in that. One of his big points was that we need to explore better ways to collaborate with the stakeholders interested or involved with data (in whatever field). I liked his idea of having a data summit on campus that would bring together researchers, data archivists, sponsored programs, institutional research people, and more to talk about the institution’s goals and everyone’s needs. We do this at UNCG on an ad hoc basis, but something like a summit would make it more systematic.
  • Richard Wiseman and Dave Rawnsley discussed the Mimas Census Dissemination Unit’s new project to update its interface for accessing UK Census data. Unfortunately, UK data files aren’t available to non-UK researchers, but it is always interesting to learn about how we disseminate data and how we think about data presentation and usability.
  • Andrea Reimer is a Vancouver city councillor who was integral to the creation of the Open Data Catalogue. She gave a fabulous talk/ call-to-arms about the need for open government data and open source software. With the creation of the catalogue, others in the city have been able to create a variety of applications (and apps) for various needs. An example is recollect.net, a reminder service for when to put your trash at the street (apparently it is more complicated than our recycling service, which stills gets me sometimes). It was inspiring for all of us to hear a non-data person talk about the importance of government data and understand the need for it to be disseminated in innovative ways (even if that requires government-private company collaboration).

Our session, Teach This!:

  • From Katharin Peter: She took a modified approach to the one-shot library workshop by creating a series of workshops called, Data in the Library. She found the most successful workshops had very specific names and covered a limited number of sources. She also had an interesting and successful collaboration with an OECD student ambassador. Even if the student isn’t sponsored by a global organization, peer collaboration is a great model for getting students interested in library instruction and resources. Katharin has another peer mentoring project in the works that I’m really excited to hear more about.
  • From Nicole Scholtz: She created a series of GIS workshops at the University of Michigan. I so wish I could take this series myself! During all of their sessions they have a rover, or back-up, in the classroom. For the kinds of resources we teach this makes sense. It can be incredibly difficult to demo and conduct exercises when it is just you with the students, even working on an easier source (like SimplyMap). But of course the difficulty is having a back-up person with the same level of comfort as the teacher (or close to). This might be a job for some of our super interns!
  • From Jackie Carter: Jackie joined our session from Mimas, a UK designated data center, at the University of Manchester. Mimas has some really interesting projects in development, but at the session she talked about data literacy and efforts to promote data literacy. Mimas has been involved with this project: http://www.esds.ac.uk/international/elearning/teaching-tools/index.asp to help create open educational resources (using real data) that could be adopted or modified by any instructor. Right now the focus of the site is mostly Economics, so I’m looking forward to seeing more disciplinary examples added.
  • My paper was a bit more theoretical and focused on the idea of the embedded librarian. You can see the slides below. It was well-received, but I haven’t fully developed the idea of embedded data librarianship really. Ideas welcome!

We also had a pecha kucha (and many of us spent half of the time trying to remember how to say pecha kucha). My slides and notes are below. Everybody did a fantastic job and I think the audience enjoyed them all. I am really in love with the pk format. It requires a level of preparedness that most people don’t put into presentations (and sometimes I  miss that!).

data @ duke and living-learning @ launc-ch

Today was full of fun and informative things. I visited Duke for its instruction retreat and UNC for a research forum.

Data @ Duke

The instruction and outreach librarians at Duke hold an annual instruction retreat and this year’s topic was data in the library. The slides from the presentations will be on their site soon if you are interested.

I missed the first session, unfortunately, but Joel Herndon, the Duke Data Librarian, gave a great introduction to the topic.

  • We see data being used more in the classroom. Why? Storage has changed and become more flexible; pervasive computing and ready tools for analysis; better and easier to use websites offering data (eg, data.gov and WDI); emerging cache in academia (sense that a literature review is not enough).
  • Data support in the classroom: What are data? What is data support?
  • Here he used three great examples of real student questions that typify the major problems:  1) Using data as a container term for all types of information (including potentially articles or printed material); 2) Looking for data that will support a theory or an argument rather than testing a hypothesis; 3) Assistance with coding problems or statistical analysis.
  • He noted that his team spends a lot of time working with students  on data quality and documentation questions. He related this to Paula Lackie’s term, “procedural pedagogy”. This the tendency for classroom work to be based on canned  or pre-structured data sets. Students aren’t equipped to then work with messier data or data that needs to be cleaned in some fashion. They have been given data to do an analysis but they haven’t been taught the skills to get to the point of analysis (in the real world).

He then gave some suggestions for what we can do in the library:

  • Include data instruction in library sessions (WOOHOO!)
  • Use data bibliographies. He mentioned Dryad archive for science and ICPSR’s bibliography.
  • Introduce scholarly communication issues into the classroom as they relate to data, especially citing data (AMEN!) but also including data sharing and archiving. So much research data is created in the classroom, but it isn’t being archived or shared. Library can help with data management issues and training.
  • Talk with your data librarian!
  • He also mentioned in the discussion time several core questions to consider when working with a student: 1) documentation – what do you have available and how useful is it?; 2) access – what is appropriate to the student’s level and what type of file format is it; 3) coverage – can a single source provide the maximum requirements for a student’s question?

Next up was a panel of faculty who work with classroom projects that involve data (not just numeric data!).

  • Victoria Szabo talked about a class related to Digital Durham called Digital Durham 2.0. You can see the projects, but students were using Google Earth and spatial data to map specific themes related to Durham.
  • Jennifer Ahern-Dodson, a rhetoric and comp professor at Duke, teaches an academic writing course that includes community-based interviews. She also has an embedded librarian who works with the class to help students develop interview questions and meet with students to narrow their research topic. The interviews are then archived at the public library. These are first-year undergraduates so the work is pretty impressive!
  • Charles Becker from the Economics Department talked about his class on urban economics in which students analyze data related to issues in Durham County and North Carolina. His undergraduates have done some incredibly sophisticated work, much of which includes spatial data.
  • The discussion centered around the role of the library in all of this and all of the panelists mentioned that helping students refine their questions to doable projects is key. We have tremendous amounts of data available now, but there are still questions that can’t be answered with what we have.

Finally a few former SLIS students presented on some data visualization tools. They approached it like a “tapas”–small selections of delightful goodies. These are the tools they featured, but you can see links to these and a few more on the Duke retreat page (right side column).

  • SimplyMap – A tremendous fave at UNCG Dataland!
  • Social Explorer – We don’t have this tool, but it has a nice free option for Census visualization.
  • Simile Project’s Citeline – You can use a bib file from Zotero or EndNote to create a browsable interface and html page. I can’t wait to play with this!
  • Many Eyes – Fun tool overall but the ladies pointed out a helpful page that discusses visualization types! Great explanation for why the pie chart is evil. ;-)
  • Batchgeo – Not sure how I would use this, but cool tool that allows you to grab table-based data with an address and create an instant map.
  • Google public data
  • GapMinder – Hans Rosling is a god.

After lunch and hearing a snippet of the closing talk, I left to attend the LAUNC-CH research forum at UNC. The slides will go up soon.

Genny O’Gara gave an presentation on students creating oral histories of former NC State student leaders. They developed a workshop to help train the students in how to conduct the interviews. Her slides have much more information. Rosalind Tedford talked about the implementation of Wake’s for-credit IL program. Jenny and I talked about living-learning communities. I wasn’t sure how useful our talk would be for UNC librarians (because the school is so much larger and very different from UNCG), but several SLIS students attended and hopefully they can use this information for their future libraries.

The posters were also great! I didn’t get to spend much time with them, but I noticed a wonderful thing. Two of our former library interns, Amanda Click and Claire Walker, were cited on one of the posters for their article on ESL students. Rawk stars! Absolutely made my already fabulous day!

The library isn’t just a building

Big day tomorrow! I’m crashing the data-focused instruction retreat at Duke University in the morning. After lunch, Jenny Dale, first-year instruction librarian extraordinaire, and I are presenting at the LAUNC-CH Research Forum. Our pretty slides are below (don’t look if you are coming tomorrow!). The presentation is on our living and learning communities project and is a slimmed down version of what we did at ACRL and will do at Metrolina.

Working on this project and another in the works (more about that soon) has made me realize how much the notion of the library and the librarian is expanding. In four short years, my work has become less about the library as a building and a collection and more about the library as a concept. The presentation tomorrow hints at moving beyond the walls that confine us (both literally and figuratively) and re-conceptualizing what our “duties” can mean.

Or I could just be overthinking it. :) More soon.

Session 2 of Accidental Gov Info Librarian coming your way!

The NCLA Government Resources Section’s webinar series is up and running. We had a hugely successful kick-off webinar covering the basics of government information. At least 50 people participated with many logging on from a classroom with multiple attendees. We even had attendees from outside of NC. Remarkable turnout!

Up next we will be doing a subject I know absolutely nothing about, so I’m really excited. More information is below and I hope you can join us. I will post the calendar of events soon, but we have two sessions in the works for June–one on the Economic Census and other on the Census 2010. We are also planning sessions on patents and another on military history and documents.

Help! I’m an Accidental Government Information Librarian Presents…Genealogy Using Government Information!

The Government Resources Section of the North Carolina Library Association welcomes you to a series of webinars designed to help us all do better reference work by increasing our familiarity with government information resources, and by discovering the best strategies for navigating them.

Our second session, “Genealogy Using Government Information,” will explore the different government resources you will use when researching family history.  The most frequently used and obvious documents are from the U. S. Census Bureau.  We will also cover online products from other sources, such as databases, libraries, state and local government offices, maps and photographs.

Leader for the second session will be Jane Johnson. Jane is a librarian in the special collections area of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Library. The Robinson-Spangler Carolina Room houses genealogical materials, state and local government documents, maps, and images. She began her library employment in 1996 and received her MLIS from the University of South Carolina in 1998.

We will meet together for Session #2: “Genealogy Using Government Information”, online on Wednesday, May 11, 2011 from 12:00 – 1:00 p.m. (EDT).

Please RSVP for the Session #2 by May 10 at 5:00 pm using this link: http://tinyurl.com/grs-session2

Technical requirements: We will be using collaborative software called Elluminate. It requires that you be able to download Java onto your computer, but you do not need any special software. After you RSVP, we will send you a link that you can use to test the software. If you have any questions, please contact Lynda Kellam (lmkellam@uncg.edu). You do not need a microphone as a chat system is available in the software, but you do need speakers or headphones. The session will be recorded and made available after the live session, linked from the NCLA GRS web page at http://www.nclaonline.org/government-resources

ACRL, embeddedness, and consultation madness

Just finished up my second ever virtual conference presentation at the national level. Jenny and I unfortunately had some technical issues, but they didn’t start until about 3/4ths of the way into the session. Hopefully people found it interesting; hopefully they will get in touch with us if they want to discuss. I definitely miss the discussion and networking opportunities of IRL conferences. Virtual sessions are great for learning, but can be difficult for idea sharing. Twitter definitely has been a great tool for the back channel talking though.

I’m attending the virtual conference, but won’t be able to catch much today. We have entered a second mid-term period, and our students are living in libraryland. I have three consultations and an office hour, so we will see how much ACRL-ing I get in.

Here are our slides if you are interested. Feel free to get in touch (or comment here) if you have any questions.

Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians, Day 2

Here are my notes from day 2 of the conference. I had a great time. Because the topic doesn’t quite fit with my usual interests, I probably wouldn’t have gone if I hadn’t had a professional connection. But I’m glad I did. It was helpful to hear speakers talk about librarianship in terms of entrepreneurship. I would probably just call it innovation and innovative thinking, but the idea is to celebrate the rethinking of our work and the way we do our everyday practices.

Katina Strauch: from an unentrepreneur, or the creator of the Charleston Conference

  • They don’t do any marketing for conference; entirely word of a mouth
  • Stages of entrepreneurship:
    • Conviction: young and stupid
    • Idea: create your own conference
    • Concept:
      • the conference captured mood of serials and acquisitions crowd
      • exhibits are held before conference and not during
      • focus on ideas and not products
    • Venture: both conference and journal are limited liability corporations
    • Business:
      • the functioning of the business
      • she talked about the things to avoid and memories of the conference
    • Building a sustainable business:

Running an Information-Services Business Within a Large Global Corporation with Mark Pandick, IBM Market Insights

  • Manages an research services unit within a company (IBM)
  • Challenge for company is having to move into new markets — how get reliable information for workers in developing countries
  • His knowledge services focus includes self-help tools and a knowledge center
  • No physical library – everything they do is virtual
  • Knowledge center has over 20,000 requests a year
  • Relationship managers – helping clients with projects (either topical areas or parts of the business);
  • Each year they start from premise they have no budget – they have to be self funding unit

Open Mic: Using Students to Crowdsource Marketing and Outreach During a Library Renovation with Dean Sullivan and Anne C. Barnhart

  • University of West Georgia
  • Try to get student buy-in with major library renovations
  • Did a “count the computers” contest: Had students count number of current computers and then compare with how many more would be provided by renovation. The put their number in a basket for a drawing.
  • They had fun signs about the renovation
  • Poetry wall
    • A temporary construction wall
    • For national poetry month told students they could write poetry on the wall
    • A lot of the poetry were Bible verses and then became graffiti
  • On another wall they told student orgs they could decorate parts of the wall. Went well except did have some controversial signs
  • How to survive the library renovation project:
    • Asked students to design posters and videos for a contest;
    • Grand prize was two $25 gift certificates to restaurants
    • Didn’t get many entries and not quality they were expecting
  • Lessons learned
    • Students had already given up on the library?
    • Sidewalk chalking might be another approach
    • Someone suggested the book, My Freshman Year, an anthropological study of freshman life

Tim Spalding, LibraryThing: I was eating lunch during his great talk, so no notes.

  • Basically he talked about what start-up is and his journey through the process of creating a start-up company.
  • He was pretty harsh about opacs and library vendors and our subservient relationships with them. He is right.

Lightning Rounds!

I gave a lightning round on our in-house librarian project. It went well (I think) and I had fun giving the talk. I was surprised by the number of people who a) seemed cynical about training an undergraduate student to be a first responder to library questions, and b) thought that a project like this would cause the downfall of the library. Or maybe it was just me.

I have to admit that stopped taking notes after my lightning talk, but here is what I did jot down.

Tim Rogers:

Ingrid Ruffin:

  • Talked about not wanting to be a librarian in a library
  • What are the transferable skills?
  • Creating information products for nonprofit organizations to help them isolate information about the groups they want to support

Angela Swiezy and Mary Gaylord from Eli Lilly:

  • The company needed to become more outcomes-based
  • Their research group did a workshop called “find the entrepreneur in you”
  • Created an interactive website with a bibliography
  • Created an idea board on which employees could post ideas from workshops
  • Entrepreneurs aren’t just risk takers; they are also collaborative and creative workers

Everyone did a great job! It is a good format for delivering ideas and keeping the interest levels high. The lightning rounds were a good challenge for me. I’m accustomed to presenting, but usually I don’t plan out quite as much. The lightning talk goes quickly and it is best to be prepared if you want to get your information out there (and make it entertaining). It is the first time in a while that I’ve written out my presentation and practiced the delivery.

Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians, Day 1

The Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians is a joint effort of Wake Forest University and my own UNCG. I didn’t get a chance to attend many sessions last time it was held (in 2009), but I’m really glad I attended today. The sessions were solid and I love getting to talk with new and old friends.

Below are some rough notes.

Mary Ellen Bates: If you haven’t heard of her (I hadn’t), Bates is a self-employed information services professional (I had never thought about this as a career!). While her session was focused on becoming an entrepreneur (mostly self-employed), most of her points were relevant to anyone who wants to create innovative practice in the library.

  • Three skill sets of info-entrepreneurs: business, professional, and entrepreneurship skills
  • Entrepreneurship is more of a mindset and not as easy to learn, but characteristics are:
    • tolerance for risk and ambiguity
    • 100% client focused; have to constantly learn what clients want now; figuring how services can be geared for your client’s needs (and not what you want to offer)
    • move out of employee mindset – or you are doing this because someone else told you to or a force is compelling you to
    • strategic perspective
    • self-confidence and self-discipline
    • self-starting
  • business skills
    • need to view self as business
      • conference attendance is part of the budget of  your prof development – think about spending money as part of the business
    • be able to close a sale
    • comfort with talking about money
    • think five years out – have a name for your company that is timeless, do not look like a start up
  • professional expertise
    • hone research skills
    • nurture your network of colleagues
    • invest in professional development
    • identify opportunities for adding value to your work (and don’t just do what is required)
  • learn to love uncertainty – embrace ambiguity; being 100% client focused means being open to anything
  • self-management – time management; never go over budget; “perfection is the enemy of good (enough)”
  • cash flow insights – watch your money and don’t use credit; price yourself accordingly
  • keep marketing self; don’t only work for one client
  • form an advisory board – mentors who can and will give feedback
  • marketing plan
    • have tangible goals (eg, I will be invited to so many presentations)
    • do simultaneous efforts (twitter and facebook and linkedin)
    • evaluate marketing plan monthly
    • fully test approaches (don’t just try) – In other words if you want to do something new, go 100% with and fully test the effort to see if it is worth your time. Even if the test is a failure, you at least will have data to know why it was a failure.
  • marketing for introverts: blogging, social media, speak in front of your clients (you gain authority in public speaking), seeing yourself as a brand
  • imposter syndrome
    • take criticism gently
    • look at self as third party
    • learn self appreciation
    • let go of knowing it all
    • don’t talk yourself into thinking everyone is thinking negatively of you
    • fake it until you make it

More information and her slides are available at http://batesinfo.com/extras/

The Library as Partner: Sustaining Relevance in a Collaborative, Student-Focused Technology Center with Heather Lambert, and Christy Groves: Great session. Very interesting and entertaining. I learned a lot not just about the Digital Media Studio, but also some project management ideas. Plus check out the No log (below). Pretty awesome idea!

  • From Middle Tennessee State University
  • Created a Digital Media Studio
  • Space includes a collaborative area with a table and white boards; roving technology assistance and research assistance; technology and research coach appointments
  • They installed open source software on half of the computers
  • Students get to vote on new open source additions
  • In the promotions they don’t talk about specific software but break it down by tasks (movie making, etc)
  • Planning process
    • Got someone from every department to be on committee
    • Communicated to entire library throughout planning process – committees would send out regular updates
    • They used a Gantt chart for timing
  • Training toolkit
    • Created a time when any staff member in library could come and practice making four projects (short 30 min sessions);
    • They put tutorials online and got a site subscription to lynda.com
  • Marketing
    • Had an amazing race with QR codes for the students
    • Also had a fall kickoff with tour of the digital media studio built in (included bowling!)
  • Studio Scribbles: their blog: students write posts with tips on using tools
  • They survey students and librarians regularly. When get feedback, they do a focus group and then change their policies or procedures within four weeks!
  • No log: whenever students have to say no to a patron, they log it in a google spreadsheet. The spreadsheet also includes the follow-up activity to deal with that No!

Business Librarians and Entrepreneurship: Innovative Trends and Characteristics with Elisabeth Leonard and Betsy Clementson: Always fun to see a former professor! Elisabeth Leonard taught my information literacy and library instruction class in grad school. She really set the foundation for my current interest in teaching.

  • They surveyed business librarians in the schools with the top ten entrepreneurship programs.
  • Nine schools participated and 20 librarians answered their survey.
  • They surveyed them to see how they fall within the self-identified categories of innovation adoption: innovator, early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggards. I won’t go into the specifics of the categories as I will link to their presentation once it is up. It does a great job.
  • Most of the respondents characterized themselves as innovators or early adopters, which is different from the way general librarians characterized themselves in a previous study (in that one most were the late majority).
  • It is a small sample but an interesting first study. Would be great to have it expanded to more business librarians or compare across subject areas.
  • Organizations need to have people spanning the  categories especially with more people in the first three groups. This encourages technology adoption.
  • Managers can influence or dampen risk-taking and innovation; they need to provide time and resources to take risks.
  • Managers need to think about the message they are sending when they talk about new changes in organizations. They also need to think about the message they are receiving from employees (are you really hear what they are saying?)

Great first day! Tomorrow is a bit jam-packed with Katina Strauch speaking at 8:15 am. Plus Tim Spalding is the lunch speaker. And I give my first lightning talk. Must go practice!

ATL rocks the docs

I attended the Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL) workshop because it was focused on the future of the government documents depository system in the southeast region. ASERL is trying to work within the system (and Title 44) to create a new model for depository libraries. The restrictions for being in the Federal Depository Library Program can be overly strict and at times archaic, but its overarching goal is valid–ensuring future access to government information.

The ASERL proposal attempts to create a regional focus for our depositories and to create Centers of Excellence (depositories that commit to collecting comprehensively in a particular agency or sub-agency). These centers would ensure that schools in the southeast have access to stronger print collections than one individual regional school could produce alone. (And I hear you asking already: “Isn’t everything already online?” No, not everything is born-digital and no, not everything is being digitized. Not even all of the important stuff is being digitized. No one has the money to digitize it all, even Google). The idea is great and needed, but it will be a long process to get to that point. The group met (mostly government docs librarians and deans) to work through the report and brainstorm and collaborate on improvement. Hopefully this approach will make the FDLP system stronger! UNCG may try to become a Center of Excellence for a smaller agency or sub-agency, but more to come as we move forward.

So it begins… #ala10 #el10ala

My preparations are gearing up, and my schedule is filling up.

The largest conference of our profession will smack some of us in the face this weekend. ALA is not my favorite conference but it has its moments. I’ve met some exciting librarians both new and experienced. My work with the Emerging Leaders program has been a lot of fun and has taught me more about working with a group (especially at a distance) than anything about ALA (but that was what i wanted from the experience ;-) ). Luckily all of the members of Project P were easygoing. We met throughout the semester using Elluminate. The one time it failed to work for us Elizabeth, another member, quickly reconvened using a free online meeting site. It was so seamless I don’t even remember which one it was! I love working with people who just look for possible solutions and go with it without complaint or hesitation. Fun times! You can check out the Emerging Leaders projects on ALA Connect and be sure to hit the poster session to say “Howdy”!

So, what is on my plate for ALA? Emerging Leader events of course. Some work the Government Documents Round Table, my awesome sponsoring organization! And my first time being on a committee for the ACRL Law and Political Science Section. I’ve been amazed how such a small section can be so active. I mean, there really aren’t that many polisigh librarians out there! It should be fun. To be honest, I’m really excited about the ‘social’ events. LPSS is having an awards luncheon at the CQ press headquarters, and GODORT is holding theirs at the Naval Observatory. Hot stuff! Two places in DC I’ve never had a reason to visit. Plus the Pro Quest Scholarship Bash at the Newseum, and my brain might explode! Or that’s an exaggeration.

Here is my schedule (may haps, things change). Maybe our paths will cross!

Friday June 25
9am – 3pm: Emerging Leaders training
3pm – 5pm: Emerging Leaders poster session – WCC 201
5:30pm – 6:30pm: LITA happy hour
6:30pm – 7:30pm: GODORT happy hour
7:30pm – 10pm: ALA open gaming night
10pm – 12am: ALA dance party

Saturday June 26
8am-
10:30am-11am: Visit vendors?
11:30am-1:30pm: LPSS luncheon
1pm – 1:30pm: social explorer demo – booth 3805
1:30pm – 3pm: Federal Documents Task Force, GODORT
4pm – 5pm: DIG (ACRL Numeric Data Interest Group Meeting)
7pm – 9pm: proquest scholarship bash
9pm – 12am: after hours party

Sunday June 27
8am – 10am: lpss nominating committee meeting
10am – 11am: lpss general membership meeting
1:30pm – 3:30pm: GODORT Education Comm meeting
3pm – 3:30pm: GODORT gitco meeting
4pm-5:30pm: LITA President’s Program
5:30pm – 6:30pm: UNCG reunion reception
6:30pm – 9pm: GODORT awards reception – Naval Observatory
Oh and I turn 35!

Monday June 28
8am – 9am: Dennis Lehane
or
8:30am – 11am: ACRL’s STS program on “Federal friends: Creating greater access to and support for science and technology information”
10:30am – 12:30pm: GODORT Program – “Archivists and Librarians: Together we can save Congress”
1:30pm – 3pm: GODORT General Membership meeting
3pm – 4pm: Junot Diaz
6:30pm – 12:15am: train for GSO

Woohoo! See you there!

« Previous PageNext Page »


ALA 2012

ala2012

Goodreads

No data found
Book recommendations, book reviews, quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists

Twitter-rific!

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.