The Lilly Conference for University Teaching and Learning was this weekend here in Greensboro. It is always a fantastic conference for sharing ideas about teaching. I will try to get my notes up here soon. In the meantime, here are the slides for a presentation I gave with the amazing Jenny Dale. It is on emotional intelligence in teaching, an idea we are both excited to explore more!
Archive for the 'teaching' Category
Emotional Intelligence and Teaching (at Lilly)
Published February 17, 2013 teaching Leave a CommentTags: emotional intelligence, lilly, teaching
An (almost) Paperless Classroom
Published December 13, 2012 teaching Leave a CommentTags: paperless classroom, psc 240, technology
In past semesters my students used about 20 pieces of paper (minimum) to complete their research projects. That’s not a lot, but when you multiply that by 40 students you have 800 pieces of paper (minimum) consumed each semester. With the costs of printing added in, I decided to try out a paperless classroom. I should admit a selfish reason as well. Every time I’ve gotten a stack of papers to grade I’ve found myself having to jump over a hurdle to get them graded because there are just SO MANY. With the paperless approach, I thought I might be able to minimize the psychological terror.
![By Jonathan Joseph Bondhus (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons](http://reinventlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/stack_of_copy_paper.jpg?w=300&h=200)
By Jonathan Joseph Bondhus (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)%5D, via Wikimedia Commons
- An annotation exercise where the students read three articles and write annotations and citations for each. The purpose is to help them understand the citation style we use (APSR) and how to write an annotation before they do an annotated bibliography. This is on average 3 pages.
- An annotated bibliography in which students write a short description of their topic and annotate 7 (will reduce this to 5) articles on a research topic. They are given guidelines on the types of sources they can use and are expected to have a good variety. This is on average 5 pages.
- The research paper with works cited. The page minimum is 5 with a maximum of 7 not including the bibliography.
- An optional revision of the research paper. I will be making this required next semester.
I also had them turn in weekly news summaries (about 250 words each) through email rather than in person. I tried using the Blackboard discussion group but had issues with plagiarism. If you are interested in this assignment, let me know because I handled it a bit differently.
My guidelines for turning in assignments were relatively simple: Times New Roman, 12-point font, Microsoft Word format, and email it to me by the deadline. I didn’t use Blackboard’s Dropbox because I wanted to make it as simple as possible. After the deadline I would email the students who didn’t turn in something and notify them that they would start losing points. This way I could find out if any thought they had turned it in, but for some reason it didn’t come through. This happened only once and the student had a time stamped email. The message went to my junk mail for some reason.
To grade, I would first submit all of the papers to SafeAssign in Blackboard to check on plagiarism. Pretty handy tool! The next part was slightly time intensive and I may need to change it. I would add my rubric to each Word doc and then save as a PDF file. This way I would have both the original and a version that could be marked up using an iPad app called iAnnotate and I could write on the PDFs using my handy little iPad stylus. You could also use track changes and the comment function in Word. Either way would work.
I would then email the students back with the PDF, which included a rubric and their score, and post their grade in Blackboard Grade Center.
Lessons Learned
What would I do differently next semester? First, I would give the students more specific guidelines for turning in their assignments. While not all students will read those guidelines, at least I could point to them and say, “Do it like this!” Or just grade them down when they don’t.
So, for instance I would probably tell them to name their emails a specific way so that I could create an email filter on gmail. Something like PSC 240 and their name would work. I would ask that they use their last name for the file name, which is what I change it to anyway.
Second, I would probably only use the iAnnotate on my iPad for the research paper and not for the other steps. The comment functions in Word work nicely and suffice without the extra step of saving it as a PDF and pulling up in iAnnotate.
Finally, I will demonstrate in class how I will be grading their assignments. I had a lot of students who were unfamiliar with the comment function in Word and couldn’t understand how to see them. Also several tried to see my comments using Google Docs or on their phones and they couldn’t see anything. The nice thing about converting the docs to PDF is that the students could see the comments on an iPad theoretically depending on which viewer they were using. But I need to at least let them know that they might need to look at the doc from a laptop or desktop and use the native Adobe Reader.
I was surprised by two things this semester. First, the number of students in my class who were using tablets. Last semester I only had one student using a tablet (although several would pull up documents on their phones), but this semester I saw at least 6 or 7 using a tablet of some kind in the semester and at least 10 would use their phones to pull up class documents (And yes, they were pulling up class documents). I want to think more on how I can build on their tech use in the classroom, but I’m not sure the tech is widespread enough at UNCG. The second surprising thing was the number of students who had never used the comment function in Word or Adobe before. I had a student tell me I was high tech after I gave back their first assignment. It was flattering, but at the same time you can see the challenge of the digital literacy divide in our own students.
I say my classroom was almost paperless because we had written exams that were administered on paper and the students answered in blue books. I also gave quizzes and one minutes that were not paperless. I could have them email me their one minute papers next semester (they would still need to do it in class, but by email instead of paper), but I’m not 100% sure about that method yet.
If you are interested in trying out a paperless classroom, I would read some of these posts from Professor Hacker: Grading with Voice on an iPad, Mark Up PDFs on Your iPad: iAnnotate PDF, Going Paperless on a Mac. There is also this great Diigo list of links on the paperless classroom. I read as much as I could before trying it. Also, Steve Katz is a tech consultant for secondary schools and has a great Prezi on the paperless classroom. It is also one of the best designed Prezis I’ve ever seen. Really gorgeous technique.
So, that was my big teaching change this semester. Thoughts? Have you attempted a paperless classroom? What did you do or would you do differently?
Oh hello fall semester, oh hello blog!
Published September 8, 2012 teaching , the profession Leave a CommentWhew, you can always tell when a fall semester hits by the decrease in blog posts. My brain is too fried to write anything pithy and clever about librarianship and my day is too busy to read or try out new projects. In the spirit of Library Day in the Life, here are the highlights of my fall semester so far. Let’s just say for any academic librarian, the fall semester requires your game face!
Pre-fall semester week (August 13-17): Getting started!
- Intern orientation! 11 hours of fun-filled orientation to the library and the reference desk! This year we have five new interns, one diversity resident librarian, two overnight staff members, and one new reference desk staff member. I think that was everyone. I’ve co-coordinated this for three years now, so it is getting easier and requires less preparation.
- Grad student orientation! A short and peppy presentation to our new graduate students (about 100-120 people?). I got the nickname of the manic librarian and got some catcalls. I’d say it was a success.
Week 1 (August 20-24): Finding Randall Jarrell Lecture Hall!
- Reference desk madness! Our reference desk is off the hizzle sometimes and the second day it was rocking. Granted most of the questions were from lost freshmen, but it is a shock to the system when you go from the still and quiet of the summer reference desk to full on BLAM! of freshmen.
- Introduction to Russian Studies! This is a new team-taught course for students in the Russian Studies major. It includes all of the Russian Studies faculty of which I am a member because of my educational background. The primary professor and I wanted to try an embedded approach with the class, so I attended the first day to say howdy.
Week 2 (August 27-30): Teaching!
- Geography classes! I help out our Geography Librarian, Nancy Ryckman, in a couple of the high data use classes every semester along with Steve Cramer. These classes are always fun introductions to the Census Bureau data, SimplyMap, NAICS codes, and more. Good times.
- Legal research! For some reason this was a high legal research week. Nancy R and I support law together (although more Nancy than me). This week I led a session for our advanced interns and staff on legal research (lots of fun and giggles, imagine that) and with Amy Harris, Media Studies Librarian extraordinaire, gave a workshop on basic case law research for Media Law students.
- Intro to Russian Studies! I met again with the Russian Studies students to do a library instruction session. I’ll write a post later on about their cool, cool project. It will be fun to share.
- The International System! I teach a class in the Political Science department on world politics each semester. It is a blast and helps to keep me up in the political science literature. I plan to write more posts on this experience during the semester.
- Ashby Residential College Core Lecture! I support the residential college as an in-house librarian and was asked to give the first core lecture of the semester. There are four core classes that are linked together around a theme (this year is America in the 20th century). Students in all four sections come together once a month or so to hear from a faculty member on a related topic and I was invited to give the first one. Amy Harris and I developed a trivia night game to introduce them to the idea of the library (most of them are freshmen and don’t have any assignments yet). It was a bit raucous and lots of fun. Our mission was accomplished. You can try your hand with the questions too! Let us know what you think.
Week 3 (September 3-7): Annual fall cold!
- Catch a cold! Every fall I catch a cold at some point. It is inevitable. I got really bored on Thursday and figured out how to put libraryh3lp on my phone. Ah, the small triumphs.
- Intro to Russian Studies! Secret fun…more to come!
- Nonprofit management! We have a certificate program in Nonprofit Management and one section of their primary course meets every other Saturday for about 6 hours. These students are troupers. I met with them today and they were awesome. When you are teaching and ask students to pause their research for a minute and they don’t want to, you know that you are teaching graduate students! Always a nice to work with willing researchers.
Week 4: What does the future hold?
Coming up next week I meet with our new Master’s of Public Affairs students, teach two more legal research classes, and we have our EndNote workshops for graduate students. Those workshops are always great fun. We’ve had some bad news from one of our colleagues, but we are all optimistic for her recovery over the next week or so. Can’t wait to have her back!
The fall semester throws a lot at an academic librarian, but it is part of the fun of the job!
What fun or insane things have you done this semester? Any new classes or initiatives?
Katy Perry’s Case for Information Literacy
Published July 1, 2012 teaching 2 CommentsTags: information deficit, information literacy
To write this post I have to admit three things: 1) These are musings that may seem a bit random, but stay with me; 2) I sometimes read the Parade magazine that comes with my newspaper; 3) I read the article on Katy Perry in Parade this morning. Hey, it makes good cereal-eating reading.
As I was skimming through trying to figure out if I knew any of Perry’s songs, I read this:
Skilled as she is at working a crowd, she did her homework as well. “I Wikipediaed ‘Fleet Week’ because I wanted to know the history. I don’t want to look like a complete idiot.”
Perry played at Fleet Week, which is a week-long shore leave for active-duty ships around major US cities (yeah, I Wikipediaed it) and she wanted to know more.
So, my initial response was sarcastic scoffing at Perry’s decision to use Wikipedia for her “research”. Then I actually tried to Google Fleet Week. My options were a couple of magazines, About.com, and the Fleet Week Facebook page (at least in the first screen because, really, who ever goes beyond the first screen).
I give Perry kudos for basic info lit savvy. According to the article, she is self-taught and motivated to learn from curiosity rather than assignments (oh, we so wish this for all of our students). In the moment of need she determined the extent of the information required and accessed it efficiently. If you want to learn the basics about Fleet Week in a quick and timely manner, Wikipedia is a decent option.
Now there is nothing new in that last statement. In our first year instruction we use Google and Wikipedia as starting points. Acknowledging their uses and limitations is a first step to becoming information literate. But because of Perry’s comment I started to think about a much larger dilemma for our information literacy programs — to what sources can our students turn when they have left the university and how do they discover them? If they are not in an information rich environment like a city with libraries/universities, how do they overcome the information deficit?
Considering the information literacy standards, we are great at teaching students how to come up with research questions, evaluate and cite information, but I wonder about our track records on finding information (Standard II). The public library would be an obvious choice for me and for you, but why would our graduates make that connection without guidance? Are we spending any time making sure our students know that what we do in the classroom can also be done in the real world (to a certain extent)? Are we so focused on university resources that we are creating graduates dependent upon us? From my experience, the answer to that question is yes because I receive emails and chats from several graduates each semester. Great for job security! Not so great for our graduates.
I started thinking about this when I had to teach SimplyMap to graduating seniors. It is a pretty complex resource and although I made the class interactive and scheduled it perfectly, I could feel some of them checking out. I realized that they if they couldn’t access the database they didn’t see how this would be helpful for their post-university lives (a few had internships and jobs lined up). I mentioned that they would still have access to the database through our state online library service called NC Live, and several of them perked up, asked questions about access and seemed more engaged for the rest of the class. We see some students coming from high school with knowledge of NC Live resources, but while they are at university we encourage them to use OUR resources and NC Live gets lost in the mix.
The literature on the importance of information literacy in the workplace is a great starting point even though it focuses more on the evaluative aspects of IL. Our goal for teaching is to impart transferable skills such as evaluation, but when it comes to knowing how to find information beyond Google and Wikipedia, what are we doing? What could we do better? How do we balance our commitment to point of need instruction (teach to the student’s need for this class and this assignment) with their preparation for a future without access to our resources? I’ve heard of some places doing workshops for soon to be graduates. Are these effective and do they have good attendance? Have you incorporated these discussions into the regular library instruction classroom and have they worked well? Have you seen other practices?
The librarian just gets it!: Metrolina Information Literacy Conference
Published June 15, 2012 conferences , teaching 1 CommentTags: information literacy, interns, metrolina
Metrolina, the Charlotte area library association, has been organizing an excellent conference each year on information literacy. As promised here are my notes. The powerpoints should be up on their site soon.
Fostering a community of collaboration: scaffolding the student research process presented by Amy Burns, Jaime Pollard-Smith (CPCC)
I have a huge library crush on Amy Burns and the folks at Central Piedmont Community College, so I was excited to see her session. This year she presented with an English instructor at CPCC with whom she has worked closely. They ran the session like a mock class to explain how they scaffolded the research process. Basically the professor prepared the students to come to the library session with three activities:
- A loop quickwrite: The student writes down a topic they think they would want to research and then they free-write for a set amount of time about the topic. The professor then asks them to pick something from their free-write that is most interesting and circle or star it. They then free-write for one minute about the circled thing. They circle something from that and free-write for thirty seconds. The professor then asks the students: “What happened as you were writing?” and “Why are we doing this before the library class?” These questions get them talking about narrowing down the research topic.
- 20 questions: The day before library session she asks them to get up and go around classroom asking classmates for questions about their topic. Each classmate is supposed to give the student one question. (I really like this activity and will definitely use it in my PSC class. May also use in library instruction.)
- Ticket to the library session: Before students may enter the library session room, they must have on a sheet of paper answers to the following questions: What is my topic? Why am I interested in my topic? What do I hope to learn from my research? They also must give their research question and do a short prewrite exercise answering the question “what do I already know about my topic?” (This is fabulous as it forces the students to do the kind of thinking we wish they would do pre-session!)
- Shows Eli Pariser Ted talk on filter bubbles
- Talks about how Google tailors content and ads for your personal information
- Talks about evaluating information: who created it? Why was it created? When was it created? Will it work for this assignment?
- Asks them to compare the sites (http://martinlutherking.org/ and http://www.thekingcenter.org/)
- Then they go to the library website and she gives them time for individual research
They talked about their high level of trust and collaboration, which allows them to have a strong research experience for their students. Jaime also mentioned that she includes Amy’s information and name in the syllabus and refers to her by name (rather than saying “Go to the library!”). This creates a personal relationship (and an embedded experience) for the students! Just shows you don’t need a formal personal librarian program to create a personal relationship!
The Feedback Loop: Student Reflection on Research, Writing, and Information Literacy presented by Jennifer Arnold (CPCC)
Jennifer is the Director of the CPCC libraries and teaches English composition classes. She had a lot of great references in her presentation, but I couldn’t catch them all. Plus she just had a lot of great information. Below are some highlights. Here is the prezi for the full picture.
My second favorite moment was seeing JESSAMYN WEST!!!!!! Squeeeee! Ahem, I mean Jessamyn West gave a lovely and funny talk on the Myths and Facts about the Digital Divide. Her materials are all linked and excellent and I was so in awe that my notes are pretty much useless. Go see what she has. The top takeaway point for me was that the digital divide isn’t just a device divide, but also and more importantly a cultural divide. Those who are the have not’s typically do not have a culture of connectedness that the have’s do. When you think about the argument that way it really hits home why this problem is a) still a problem, b) not easily surmountable, and c) typically discussed in terms that obscure its complexity. Thank you Metrolina for bringing a library goddess to be your keynote speaker. You made this librarian’s summer.
Beyond the Basics presentation @Metrolina #mlail2012
Published June 15, 2012 conferences , outreach , teaching Leave a CommentTags: information literacy, metrolina, teaching
Yesterday was the 7th Annual Metrolina Information Literacy Conference, always a fun and informative conference. The sessions were fabulous and we heard from Jessamyn West! I will post my notes later, but here are the materials from my presentation with Jenny Dale on teaching upper-level students. We developed the presentation because there is a tendency at information literacy discussions/conferences to assume the target audience is first-year students. Those of us teaching upper-level students don’t get quite the same amount of attention. It can be difficult to adapt materials designed for entry-level students to classes with students who have some background in research and their discipline.
We are going to try to do some workshops on this topic, so if you attended and have suggestions or ideas, please let us know!
Here is the information from our handout, if you are interested or didn’t get one. We only made 20 and we ended up with around 40 attendees! Thank you to everyone who attended! It was a great group.
- UNCG’s Information Literacy Outcomes
http://library.uncg.edu/info/help/Information_Literacy_learning_outcomes.pdf
- Discipline-specific Information Literacy Standards
- Anthropology and Sociology:
http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/anthro_soc_standards
- Political Science:
http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/PoliSciGuide.pdf
- Psychology:
http://crln.acrl.org/content/71/9/488.full
- Science and Engineering/Technology:
http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitscitech
- Anthropology and Sociology:
- Assessment tools
- Poll Everywhere
http://www.polleverywhere.com
- Lynda’s use of Poll Everywhere with Libguides:
http://uncg.libguides.com/psc260
- Lynda’s use of Poll Everywhere with Libguides:
- Sample worksheets that we have used:
http://tinyurl.com/ulworksheets
- Poll Everywhere
Mad research skillz: Workshop on developing undergraduate research
Published May 23, 2012 teaching 1 CommentTags: political science, undergraduate research
Summer is the prime season for conferences and workshops and last week was the kick-off!
Office of Undergraduate Research Faculty Development Workshop
The Office of Undergraduate Research designed this three day workshop to assist faculty who want to incorporate research into their undergraduate classes. The attendees were teaching faculty from all over the university (sciences to humanities to business). I come from political science where research papers are standard, but some disciplines don’t seem to have the same expectations, especially at the undergraduate level. This workshop helped us create research-based assignments in a thoughtful manner. The most useful part for me was brainstorming how I could get beyond the traditional research paper tacked onto the end of the course.
I attended to develop the assignments in my class, but I think it helped having a library insider in the room. Jenny Dale and Kathy Crowe from the library gave an excellent presentation on library services that sparked later conversations about library support. After the formal presentation, I was able to answer questions about the possibilities for collaboration with the library. Also I was able to see the assignment design process from the beginning stages, which is where the library really needs to be!
My goal for the workshop was pretty straightforward. I want to increase the quality of my student research without increasing the quantity of assignments. The class I teach is 200-level and an introductory course so the assignments need to be appropriate. The most useful tool in the workshop was the LOGIC model. I can’t remember where she got this, but the model includes three questions: What is my objective? What do I do to meet my objective? And what evidence do I use to demonstrate that my students have done that? Translated to assignment creation, we focus on the outcome, the activity to practice the outcome, and then the assessment of their ability. In libraryland we are great at doing the first and third parts. We have our learning objectives and then we are sure to assess them, but I feel like the middle component sometimes isn’t as strategically developed. In this model, we are assured that practice a student has in or out of the classroom relates back to the objective and then they are assessed on that specific objective.
For the workshop the research process was divided into discrete parts so that we could focus on specific objectives. My main objective has been developing my students’ ability to paraphrase and then synthesize their research. So many of my papers are long string of quotes interspersed with the writer’s insights (hopefully). To reach this objective I have several activities in mind:
- News journals: They choose a news story related to the class, write a summary (which requires paraphrasing) and then respond to the article. I did these for two semesters and several students have said that they liked doing them (it forced them to keep up with the news). I always saw them as separate from the research project, but they are their first paraphrasing activity. Maybe I need to encourage them to tie them into the research paper if appropriate.
- Image captioning: I use images a lot in my class, but I would like to do an activity each week where I show an image related to the week’s readings and then ask them to create a caption for it on an index card. This is a different skill from the usual and requires the ability to synthesize information. Plus I can use it as a mini-reading quiz.
- Source comparison and annotation exercise: After a library session in which we talk about sources, they have to compare three sources of information (scholarly, newspaper, and government information) on a particular topic. I like doing this activity, but may need to think through the logistics.
- Annotated bibliography for paper: Post our second library session they turn in an annotated bib on their chosen topic with a variety of sources.
I also have some assessments:
- Paraphrasing on exams: I got this idea from a presentation at the workshop. On their exams you give students quotes from the readings. They then must paraphrase the quote and respond– basically telling you what it means.
- The paper: Hopefully at this point they will be able to paraphrase. I also do an optional revision process where they get feedback and can improve their grades.
- An executive summary of the paper: Last semester I did a memo to the President where students needed to concisely and precisely sum up their findings to the President and tell him what he should do. The results were fine, but not great. This year I might do a more creative component for this where students have to do a short persuasive elevator speech with a visual. The visual could be a PowerPoint or an image or even a short video. It would function the same as the memo, but they get to choose the audience they would like to persuade. I’d really like to see some of them do short newscasts, but that’s a lot to ask (and watch with 40 students). The whole point is to sum up (or paraphrase) their own research in a understandable and thoughtful manner.
Well, those are my main ideas. Anything I’m missing? Suggestions welcome!
Help! #7 = health
Published August 11, 2011 outreach , teaching Leave a CommentTags: government information, government resources section, help!
Help! I’m an Accidental Government Information Librarian presents… Good Health (Information) in North Carolina on September 7
The Government Resources Section of the North Carolina Library Association welcomes you to a series of webinars designed to help us all do better reference work by increasing our familiarity with government information resources, and by discovering the best strategies for navigating them.
North Carolina state government agencies and public universities publish a great deal of interesting health and healthcare information of value to researchers and reference librarians. In this webinar, learn about the important data sources and how to get access them.
Rebecca Hyman is the Reference and Outreach Librarian, Information Services Branch, and Kurt Brenneman is the Agency Outreach Librarian, Resource Management Services Branch, both at the Government & Heritage Library. The Library is part of the State Library of North Carolina, a division of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources.
We will meet together for Session #7, online on September 7 from 12:00 – 1:00 p.m. (EDT). Please RSVP for the Session by September 6 at 5:00 pm using this link:
http://tinyurl.com/grs-session7
Technical requirements: We will be using collaborative software called Elluminate. It requires that you be able to download Java onto your computer, but you do not need any special software. After you RSVP, we will send you a link that you can use to test the software. If you have any questions, please contact Lynda Kellam (lmkellam@uncg.edu). You do not need a microphone as a chat system is available in the software, but you do need speakers or headphones.
The session will be recorded and made available after the live session, linked from the NCLA GRS web page (
http://www.nclaonline.org/government-resources
).
Do patents scare the bejesus out of you? Well, this might be your cure…
Published June 29, 2011 outreach , teaching Leave a CommentTags: government resources section, help!, ncla, patents
Whether you’re using them as a rich source of technical information or to determine if your invention is new and novel, patents are a valuable, complicated, and often underutilized public resource. On July 13, our fifth session will discuss patent searching tools, both those freely available over the Internet and those accessible only through Patent & Trademark Depository Libraries. We will also be discussing how to do a patent search, what you should and shouldn’t do when you’re helping patrons with patent questions, and the pros and cons of using Google Patents.
http://tinyurl.com/grs-session5
Technical requirements: We will be using collaborative software called Elluminate. It requires that you be able to download Java onto your computer, but you do not need any special software. After you RSVP, we will send you a link that you can use to test the software. If you have any questions, please contact Lynda Kellam (lmkellam@uncg.edu). You do not need a microphone as a chat system is available in the software, but you do need speakers or headphones.
The session will be recorded and made available after the live session, linked from the NCLA GRS web page (
http://www.nclaonline.org/government-resources
).



