Archive for the 'reading' Category

CBR4 4: The Heretic Queen by Michelle Moran

Queens! Queens! Yeah, I’m on a historical fiction about women roll. I read Michelle Moran’s Madame Tussaud last year and liked her writing. Her dialogue is not as forced as Phillipa Gregory’s can be …

“My dear cousin, the Duke of Buckingham, sent me a letter,” she exclaimed to her sister.

Did people really call their dearest by their titles at all times? Couldn’t Cousin Buckie be sufficient? I know her books have a large number of characters but she doesn’t always have to remind us who everyone is.

But it also didn’t read like a Sharon Kay Penman history disguised as a novel …

“Pamplona was an ancient city, founded by the Roman general Pompey.” (That’s an actual quote.)

I love Penman. Fabulous author. Well-researched novels. And a wonderful sleep aid.

So, because I liked her other book, I thought I’d try out some more of her novels. She is a relatively new historical fiction writer with only four books currently. The Heretic Queen is one of three about Egyptian queens, starting with Nefertiti and going to Cleopatra’s Daughter. This is not a series and they can be read independently. The Heretic Queen is about Nefertari, wife of Ramses II of the Nineteenth dynasty, and her struggle to become Queen.

I really enjoyed the novel and the main character although I wasn’t sure I would at first. The weakest point of the book is the beginning. I can’t imagine how difficult it is to write a historical novel about ancient Egypt and maintain any historical accuracy. It must be ten times harder to write a novel about ancient Egypt with the main characters as children. Whoa. Those kids were, well, kids, and how do you write about kids in ancient Egypt? Children in most cultures and time periods have been considered miniature adults up until the 20th century’s cult of kids emerged. It was pretty risky for her to start out a book focused on three pre-teens, but Nefertari develops well and we move on with less awkward dialogue after the first few chapters.

Personally, knowing nothing about ancient Egypt, Moran seems to have done her homework. She integrates Egyptian terminology seamlessly and her descriptions are well developed. I found myself easily able to imagine the palace and the rooms in which these characters lived. I may be easy to please, but if I can feel immersed in a character and a scene, then I usually am quite happy with a book.

It was that level of immersion that I felt in Madame Tussaud. I was happy to see it again in The Heretic Queen. I have her other two Egyptian novels on my shelf (thank you paperback swap!) and look forward to seeing more novels from Moran.

CBR4 3: The White Queen by Phillipa Gregory

Chronicling my historical fiction fun reading isn’t something I ever imagined doing, but I also usually don’t read so many books in one month. Thanks Cannonball Read for the motivation!

Last week I read the The White Queen by Phillipa Gregory. It is the first in The Cousins’ War series that covers the lives of three women during the War of the Roses. I started with the second novel, The Red Queen, which overall I thought was good for Gregory but I hated the main character. The main character in The White Queen is Elizabeth Woodville who marries (or seduces if you prefer) King Edward IV of England. She is an interesting and controversial historical figure because she was a commoner who married a king of England. Because of her family’s meteoric rise to power through her marriage, they quickly gained many enemies. When Edward’s reign was contested by his brother, etc she and her family became targets. Her sons by Edward IV are the princes in the tower whose deaths were attributed to Richard III (although I guess that doesn’t really hold water anymore).

I personally found the character of Elizabeth more engaging than her rival Red Queen, which is funny considering my friend Janel had the opposite impression (Ah, the joys of reading). While the use of magic is quite heavy handed at times, I found the character less grating and her story is much more varied that Margaret Beaufort’s constant praying and cackling that “My son will be king!”

I was also really impressed with Gregory’s scenes of the armies on the move, in particular the description of the Duke of Buckingham’s failed rebellion in the face of the (“magic”) storm. Her descriptions have definitely improved even if the dialogue may seem a bit off at times.

Overall it is a good series for historical fiction. I am on the waiting list for the final book in the triology the third in what may be a long running series (Wha?! The War of the Eoses did end, Phillipa), The Lady of the Rivers, about Elizabeth’s mother. I’ve read that it is the weakest of the three. We will see soon!

CBR4 2: No Higher Honor by Condoleezza Rice

I left my Political Science PhD program on 9/12/2001. I’ll always be able to remember the day for an obvious reason, and for a host of reasons I was ready to start on a new path in life. I have to admit after so many years of living and breathing political science I was ready to bury my head in the sand for a bit (well, relatively speaking). So, Rice’s book is about the first truly political book I’ve read in a long while. She covers her beginnings in the administration as the National Security Advisor and moves through her time as Secretary of State. It is a long path in a very tragic and troubling decade, but despite a few slow moments it is quite well-written and engaging.

It would have been difficult to be alive during the Bush administration and NOT be aware of most of her narrative. Her book goes in-depth on the obvious issues–War on Terrorism, war in Iraq, war in Afghanistan–even if we learn nothing much new. I was surprised she included a discussion of the antagonism between the Defense Department/Vice-President’s camp on one side and pretty much all the people I could possibly respect in the administration on the other side (Colin Powell mainly and sometimes Rice). Of course this is Condi’s story and she gets to spin it however she pleases. I’m half inclined to read the Rumsfeld book just to see what his excuse was, especially for not having a post-invasion reconstruction plan, but I’m not sure I want to give it my time.

Beyond the most obvious events, Rice details some aspects of the administration’s foreign policy that were lost in the noise of the wars on everything. The Bush policy in Africa and Latin America while definitely having an ideological slant was for the most part positive. I can’t imagine a single one of the current crop of Republican hopefuls having the same level of engagement on HIV and other issues in the developing world (even if the Bush level of engagement was hardly adequate).

Another aspect of the book that makes it worth the read is that Condi is a political scientist and has the ability to rise above the ideology of the time to talk intelligently about the events. For example, if you agree with the Freedom Agenda or not, it is interesting to read about her understanding of it as a redefinition of realism that could incorporate elements of the democratic peace. I’ve even thought about maybe using parts of the book in my international relations class. Students could see the theories as more than just Political Science, but as a tradition that has emerged out of foreign policy and history and that is still interwoven in the actions of our leaders. Her use of theory is simplified but it is also engaging. And honestly, that is more than you can say for most textbooks.

Overall I would recommend to anyone looking for a narrative of the complex political events of the past decade.

CBR4 1: The Troubled Man by Henning Mankell

So, here goes some book reviews for Cannonball Read 4. It is too late to sign up but you can learn all about some books there.

My friend recommended this novel to me as a good winter break read. She just told me that it was Swedish and had spy thriller elements. She didn’t tell me that it is the final book in a series of crime fiction starring our favorite Swedish police officer, Kurt Wallander. Needless to say I had no idea it was the final one. I was a bit depressed when I halfway through I finally read the liner notes and realized I had started at the end. But no matter. In the book’s favor I enjoyed it even if it is the last of its kind.

When it opens up Wallander’s daughter decides to have a child with a man whose father was a high ranking officer in the Swedish navy. This naval officer, von Enke, indicates to Wallander that he has a story to tell involving high intrigue on the high seas, but soon after he goes missing and Wallander never gets the chance to find out what in the world the guy was talking about. Wallander takes up the mystery at his daughter’s request and soon after von Enke’s wife also goes missing.

Obviously I can’t compare this book to the other novels in the series. On its own, it is well worth the read. Generally I’m not a fan of crime fiction, but this book brings in the spy thriller elements that make it more than your run of the mill crime work. It also echos the finer qualities of John le Carre without his tendency toward heavy-handed politics. Actually, Wallander is about as apolitical as you can get, which makes the story even more interesting. He spends his time trying to understand the situation before him, not preaching about it (I’m thinking Constant Gardener le Carre here).

The only criticism I would throw out there is that Mankell tends to give information for which I don’t see a purpose, like the couple of times when mid-story Wallander decides to clean out his fridge. Maybe it is his attempt to create reality? I understand that, but it seemed jarring to me at times.

I don’t want to give away how Mankell closes the book on Wallander, but I have to give props to his approach. It felt absolutely believable. Read it and you will see what I mean.

Empires of the Word

Closing out 2011, I just finished an incredible book – Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World by Nicholas Ostler. Just to give you a taste of his fine writing …

“But despite the myth of the Tower of Babel, and its vulgar interpretation as a cautionary tale, language diversity is not a liability for the human race. Most people in the world are multilingual, and everyone could be … Different languages protect and nourish the growth of different cultures, where different pathways of human knowledge can be discovered. They certainly make life richer for those who know more than one of them.” (pg. 558)

Ostler surveys the varied histories of the major languages of the world and how they developed within and between societies.  He counters the argument that language spreads through power or economic necessity only, but instead through “the creation of a larger human community.” In incredible detail he describes the historical developments within a dozen or so language communities, from Sumerian, Akkadian, Arabic, Chinese (the languages that spread by land) to Spanish, Portuguese, and English (the languages that spread by sea).

He closes with a discussion of the future for the top modern languages, especially English. While he avoids prognosticating any bright or bleak futures for our current lingua franca, he argues that the evidence is not solely in favor of English’s continued dominance.  After reading 400 or so pages detailing the histories of languages that once had been the ‘global’ powerhouses of their times, you would probably be inclined to nod your head at Oslter’s statement “For languages, as for any human institution, when you are on top, sooner or later there is only one way to go.”

I started reading this book because of my past interest in language, identity construction, and the former Yugoslavia. Benedict Anderson fans will definitely find a kindred spirit in Ostler. But it is worth reading for anyone interested in the role of language, communication and literacy in societies (i.e., librarians!). He addresses briefly the impact of modern media on English, but as he is taking a broader historical view it isn’t the real purpose of the book.

That broader historical view of language is exactly what I like about the book. He isn’t looking at languages as rigid creations that emerge intact and never evolve. This is what I hate about lists like a post that showed up on Facebook recently, 10 words you mispronounce that make people think you’re an idiot. Granted Bush’s pronunciation of the word nuclear made him sound a wee bit ‘cuntry’, but some of these words have acceptable alternate pronunciations (sherbet and often) based on their evolution in our society. While I understand the drive to promote a more perfect English, especially in written form, at the same time I can’t sympathize with anyone who ignores the dynamic and evolving nature of any language (Never mind the post’s latent point that people who speak with regional accents, primarily rural, are idiotic). But I digress.

Through this fabulous work, Ostler describes the ebbs and flows, the evolutions, and sometimes deaths of our many languages. It is a long book, but well worth the trouble.

Hey librarians! You read, right? #CBR4

Got any 2012 book recommendations? I signed up for Cannonball Read 4 for 2012. 52 books and 52 reviews in a year. Yes, this may be a form of procrastination, and yes, I have a tenure package due and a class to teach and, oh yeah, a real job, but hey, maybe this will be the year I read over 20 books. (I’m looking at you YA! Come on. Make mama proud.)

So, I need some recommendations (over 100 pages, please). Here is what I have on my list so far. You should sign up for CBR4! Lovely Janel is the queen of the CBRs. Check out those lists! Roar!

If I hit 52 books and 52 reviews, maybe I’ll … do … something. Who knows. You can give me recommendations for that too.

Pre-CBR4 and 2011 reading

I signed up for the Cannonball Read 4 for next year. The goal is to read 50 books and write reviews of them. I follow my friend Janel’s reviews and thought it might be fun to try. I’m not the fastest reader (this year I only hit 23 books), but I’m up for the challenge. And I like the idea of writing something short if only for my future reference.

These entries are for my own reference and the CBR4 requirements, but maybe you will find a book that sounds interesting. Here is my first quick and dirty review in honor of the upcoming CBR4 (starts Jan 1, 2012).

The Red Queen by Philippa Gregory

I’ve only finished one other Gregory novel, The Other Queen, and while it wasn’t dreadful I was less than impressed with her writing, especially the voice of Catherine Howard, Henry VIII’s fifth victim. I mean wife. But I love historical fiction in general, especially about British history, so I picked this one up for some fun reading.

The book is set during the War of the Roses and follows the life of Margaret Beaufort, the main heir to the Lancastrian line to the throne. For background on this complex period Alison Weir’s War of the Roses is really good. Gregory does a good job simplifying the history to the main elements needed though and because of that it is a engaging story. She is at her best narrating historical events. I especially liked her description of the Battle of Bosworth Field for the most part.

The downfall of the book for me is the main character. She is unlikeable, self-righteous and delusional. By the end I wanted her son to succeed (which of course he does) just so she would shut up. To Gregory’s credit she engaged me as a reader even with a protagonist I could not stand and for whom I had little sympathy.

The Red Queen is the second in a trilogy, but they can be read out of order. I just got the first, The White Queen, about Elizabeth Woodville from the library. We will see if I like her better.

Teaching techniques galore!

In preparation for a presentation at the Lilly Conference on College and University Teaching, I read Practical Pedagogy for Library Instructors: 17 Innovative Strategies to Improve Student Learning. The book was very helpful, both for our session and my teaching. Below are some rough notes if you are interested. Some chapters were more relevant to me, so I’ve fleshed out those notes a bit. All of the chapters are interesting and I would encourage any librarian instructor to pick it up! It is definitely worth the read.

And more to come soon about Lilly! It was a great conference, but there was lots to process.

Chapter 1: how teach makes difference in what students learn; “Effective instruction demands the use of many strategies.” (pg 2)

  • direct instruction (objectivism): present info effectively and efficiently; behavioral change is ultimate goal; demo of databases is example of behavioral direct instruction; using analogies (compare this database to online searching) is cognitive instruction;
  • Use of instructional objectives is major contribution of behavioral theories (“planning for outcomes can make a difference in your teaching”)
  • tailoring to different learning styles is example of cognitive style – students are active, but the focus is on teacher shaping classroom to elicit desired behaviors
  • acrl info lit competencies: develop research plan, identify keywords/synonyms, select controlled vocab, construct and implement search strategy and search
  • student-centered learning (constructivism): focus on the situation in which student in which student is engaged (pg 5); focus on students learning by having students interact with each other; social justice component

Direct instruction (objectivism) examples:

Chapter 2:

  • cephalonian method = students are given color coded cards with questions to help them guide (in a way) the library tour. They are called on through the “tour” to ask certain color categories while the librarians are presenting a powerpoint of the “tour”. The tour is held in a lecture hall.
  • the cards are color coded for different categories of info (blue = basic info, yellow = recommend reading, red = services & facilities, green = misc)
  • PowerPoint slides correspond to the cards (but this would be great for prezi)
  • Process: played music at beginning, hand out cards, ask students to stand and ask question based on colors; asked questions at end of session to test crowd knowledge
  • my thoughts = could be easily adapted to a variety of sessions, the planting of questions may seem artificial but students often don’t know what questions to ask us. This way it is guided but interactive. I may try this in my residential college session in the fall.

Chapter 3: universal design for learning – use different teaching strategies to reach diverse groups of learners

Chapter 4: clickers; used in a plagiarism session

Chapter 5:  brief lecture followed by library research game; good discussion of how she implemented the game and the questions she asked. While I wouldn’t ask the same questions, they provide fuel for creating your own.

Chapter 6: transferability of concepts learned in instruction session.

  • instruction sessions emphasize concepts and transferability;
  • metaphor helps with understanding;
  • first asking students what they have done already re research; next use google for searching;
  • they use guess the google game in class to help with thinking about keyword brainstorming (http://grant.robinson.name/projects/guess-the-google/)

Chapter 7: teaching with stories/analogies

Chapter 8: jigsawing

  • cooperative learning – using small groups to reinforce student learning;
  • subset of wider idea of collaborative learning;
  • refers to this article as good one for LI (http://www.libraryinstruction.com/active.html);
  • they used half-jigsaw because of time constraints;
  • half-jigsaw = divide students into groups; teams given info resource to explore and basic instructions and tasks; students present to the class on findings; assess entire class with short exercise on what they learned from group presentations (keeps students focused on what groups are presenting)

Student-centered learning examples
Chapter 9: peer-led criteria creation

  • peer-led discussion groups to develop evaluation criteria for an “information text” (adolescent non-fiction);
  • gave students a “graphic organizer” with guided questions;
  • REALLY COOL!

Chapter 10: the imaginary undergrad

  • Because effective researchers are process-driven and not tool-driven (!!!) how to get students to think like they do?;
  • she creates an imaginary undergraduate with the students and then asks them for research topics for the students;
  • for the research process she asks them to come up with the process and use the computer to see if it works;
  • works best in small classes (6-9 people!) and upper-level students with general need to focus on research process (and not need to know about specific resources);
  • really cool approach but would it work in our one-shots? not so sure.

Chapter 11: personality tests

  • uses a short modified meyers-briggs personality quiz to teach boolean logic (called discover your perfect career which no longer seems to be on monster.com!);
  • asks students to raise hands if they match AND conditions based on their personality tests versus OR conditions (seems a bit convoluted to get to this activity);
  • next translates that to the library databases; then translate the library database to google search logic

Chapter 12: plagiarism tutorial

  • super cool plagiarism module in a info lit credit course (I’m going to use this with Ashby);
  • peer interviews, find the plagiarized text on google, paraphrasing exercises with hands-on group activity;
  • each activity took a week’s lesson

Chapter 13: Wikis and instruction

Chapter 14: Library session based on amazing race (for the equivalent of a UNS tour); involved chaos and running (my faves!!)

Chapter 15: Electronic portfolios as assessment tools

Chapter 16: Students presented their research findings in a movie format; talks about implementing the session and using technology in instruction

Chapter 17: Great chapter on creating an experiential instruction session/experience for ESL students. Asked students to fill out a matrix that compared the American library with their home library according to certain questions (e.g., How do you check books out?) (pg 165)

Chapter 18: Students created their own zines as part of a course on inequalities. The zine creation led up to a traditional research paper, but the students indicated that they felt better prepared for the research process. Pretty nifty!

love of reading meme…because I have a life again…

We are on the downhill portion of the semester and I’m starting to have more free hours at work and less stress in general. Admittedly I’ve had little time for reflection and even less time for writing. So, to replace a lack of words, I read. And in honor of reading, here is a love of reading meme, round 2.

What have you just read?
The Vegan Lunch Box around the World by Jennifer McCann. This is a fun little cookbook vegan style. It is geared to the Bento Box craze (which was new to me), but I like it because the cookbook is built around little menus from different countries. So, you can choose to do the Japanese themed bento box with several little courses. Granted this is not authentic stuff, but the menus are well designed and the recipes are pretty tasty, even for vegan food ;)
And yes, I read cookbooks. I admit it.

What are you reading now?
Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood. I’ve owned this one a while and admittedly could never get into it. It isn’t a great book, but I wanted to read it before hitting Year of the Flood, which is a companion work to Oryx and Crake and supposedly The Awesome. The New York Times Book Review compared this new one to The Blind Assassin, one of my faves. Here’s hoping it is that good because Oryx and Crake is mighty bleh.

For the Friends of the Library book club I’m reading The Architecture of Happiness by Alain de Botton. It is a beautifully written and designed book on the influence architecture and the environment can have on our well being. I can’t wait to see how the professor, Patrick Lucas, handles the FOL discussion group because unlike typical book club reads it isn’t heavy on plot and characters. There was mention of a group activity! More to come on that most likely.

How do you organize your books? (By genre, title, author’s last name, etc.?)
My partner has some of them organized but I have no clue what scheme he used. I have the classics on one bookshelf, the contempo lit on another, and nonfiction elsewhere. That is about as organized as I’ve ever been with books. And yes I am a librarian.

Do you have any idea what you’ll read when you’re done with that?
As mentioned, The Year of the Flood by Atwood. Here is the review if you are interested. I also recently bought The Children’s Book by A.S. Byatt. This tome is a bit daunting, but I liked Possession and I figured I’d give it a go. I’ll probably dig myself out from under sometime next year because I’m a slooowwww reader.

What book would you like to read soon?
I’m really stuck on that one. I’d like to give Netherland by Joseph O’Neill a go finally. I’ve had it sitting on my desk forever. My friend and I are talking about starting a nonfiction reading group (of two) soon. I think we may read Blue Latitudes by Tony Horwitz. Any suggestions of great, awesome, wonderful books you are reading?

For the Love of Reading meme: Just for fun and to celebrate a well deserved day off…

Today is my first full day off this semester (Labor Day doesn’t count because I prepped class ALL day). I do need to clean house (the partner is turning 30 and the parental units are showing up), but most of the day will be spent reading. So, what better way to celebrate reading on rainy days off than a reading meme. Love it.

What have you just read?
Last book I finished was The Looming Tower by Lawrence Wright about Al-Qaeda and the build up to 9/11. Excellent book by the way.

What are you reading now?
For our Friends of the Library book club, I’m reading The Innocent Man by John Grisham. I would’ve never picked this up on my own and I’m a bit surprised it was on the list, but hey that’s why you join a book club, right?!
Also, I’m finishing up When Christ and His Saints Slept by Sharon Kay Penman. And when I say finishing up, I mean I’m hitting the 300 page mark in the 600 pager. Great book, just little long.

Do you have any idea what you’ll read when you’re done with that?
The next book club book is Stoner by John Williams. I also want to read Blue Latitudes by Tony Horwitz because he is the funniest thing ever. I’m trying to read The Librarian Instruction Cookbook. … Trying.

What’s the worst thing you were ever forced to read?
Anything with the word competencies or guidelines in the title. Also some of my grad school Political Science literature was so horribly written that I wanted to rip my eyes out.

What’s one book you always recommend to just about anyone?
Kafka on the Shore by Haruki Murakami. Seriously, you should read it. I have a copy. You can borrow it.

Admit it, sadly the librarians at your library know you on a first name basis, don’t they?
Um. Well, sadly, yes. Because I’m a librarian. Do you have a problem with that?

Is there a book you absolutely love, but for some reason, people never think it sounds interesting, or maybe they read it and don’t like it at all?
The Evolution of Cooperation by Robert Axelrod

Do you read books while you eat?
Books and magazines. I’m hard core like that.

While you bathe?
Well, not that hard core.

While you listen to music?
Hells no.

When you were little did other children tease you about your reading habits?
No. I was big enough that I could beat them up.

What’s the last thing you stayed up half the night reading because it was so good you couldn’t put it down?
Strangely enough, Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell. Not a perfect book, but the section on the Korean airline was riveting. And I’m not being sarcastic.

Have any books made you cry?
Oscar and Lucinda by Peter Carey. Threw it across the room a couple of times too. Read it. Great book. I have a copy. You can borrow it.


Twitter-rific!

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.