Archive for March, 2011

ACRL, embeddedness, and consultation madness

Just finished up my second ever virtual conference presentation at the national level. Jenny and I unfortunately had some technical issues, but they didn’t start until about 3/4ths of the way into the session. Hopefully people found it interesting; hopefully they will get in touch with us if they want to discuss. I definitely miss the discussion and networking opportunities of IRL conferences. Virtual sessions are great for learning, but can be difficult for idea sharing. Twitter definitely has been a great tool for the back channel talking though.

I’m attending the virtual conference, but won’t be able to catch much today. We have entered a second mid-term period, and our students are living in libraryland. I have three consultations and an office hour, so we will see how much ACRL-ing I get in.

Here are our slides if you are interested. Feel free to get in touch (or comment here) if you have any questions.

Help! I’ve got govdocs dust in my eye!

I’m an Accidental Government Information Librarian…

My apologies to anyone who has used this title before, but well, you know, creativity and all that. Anyway, the NCLA’s Government Resources Section is trying out a webinar series starting in April and (fingers-crossed) having one once a month through the summer. Upcoming topics will include law, Economic Census, and lots more (maybe even military history??). I’ve opened this up to anyone hoping that our Elluminate software can manage it. Hope you can join us! It is a great prof dev opportunity to put on the pesky annual report.

Feel free to get in touch with me if you have any questions (or concerns). We can commiserate over a froyo.

Help! I’m an Accidental Government Information Librarian…

For many reference staff, even those with years of reference experience, integrating government information into our ‘reference toolkit’ can be a daunting prospect.  The proliferation of electronic government information means that reference staff will be expected to have knowledge of government information that was previously largely the purview of government documents staff.

The Government Resources Section of the North Carolina Library Association welcomes you to a series of webinars designed to help us all do better reference work by increasing our familiarity with government information resources, and by discovering the best strategies for navigating them.

Our first session, “The Basics,” provides a general, basic overview of government information as it pertains to reference work.  What types of information flow from the three branches of government that are important to your patrons?  What major portals are most useful for finding U.S. Government information? What types of government statistics are available and how can they be found?  What basic knowledge do I need to effectively locate government information?

The introductory session will be followed over the next few months by more specialized government information sessions on congressional materials, legal materials, government information for business, statistical resources, historical/genealogical resources, science, state-level information, and more.

Leader for the first session, “The Basics,” will be Bryna Coonin, M.L.I.S, M.B.A.  Bryna served as a graduate student at UNC Libraries in the mid-1980’s for the late Ridley Kessler. She has worked as a reference librarian at the University of Georgia, NC State University, and is currently at Joyner Library, East Carolina University (ECU).  Bryna taught basic reference for the School of Information & Library Science at UNC-Chapel Hill and basic reference and government documents courses for the graduate library school program at ECU. A longtime member of NCLA, she has chaired both the Reference & Adult Services Section (RASS) and the Government Resources Section (GRS).

We will meet together for Session #1: The Basics, online on Thursday, April 14, 2011 from 12:00 – 1:00 p.m. Please RSVP for the Session #1 by April 13: http://tinyurl.com/grs-session1

Technical requirements: We will be using collaborative software called Elluminate. It requires that you be able to download Java onto your computer, but you do not need any special software. After you RSVP, we will send you a link that you can use to test the software. If you have any questions, please contact Lynda Kellam (lmkellam@uncg.edu). You do not need a microphone as a chat system is available in the software. The session will be recorded and made available after the live session, linked from the NCLA GRS web page at http://www.nclaonline.org/government-resources .

Stats Abstract: Not just a ‘govdocs’ issue

In the data and government information world there have been a lot of noise about the demise of the Statistical Abstract because of the planned termination of the Statistical Compendia Branch. Others have discussed this issue in much greater detail than I can do at this point. Below are their posts to help you make up your own mind about this issue.

Sources for more information

I don’t do govdocs! Why should I care?

I have had questions from non-gov info or non-data librarians about the situation, and some of those have hinted at why they should care. Well, here’s my two cents (or rant if you prefer).

  1. Stats Abstract is the entry-level source for finding basic statistics. You can then use it to find more statistics from the collecting agency. I know non-data/gov librarians who use it this way, and I do so myself as well.
  2. At a school with a data/gov info nerd, they could stand in as a human Stats Abstract (ideally), but some schools and public libraries aren’t so lucky to have one of our kind. I know, I know, shocking, but true.
  3. Other commercial sources aggregate the same kind of information, especially ProQuest Statisical Insight, but at $16K a pop there is no way my library can afford it. Beyond that, should we expect this kind of information to come from commercial publishers? Do you want to pay a commercial publisher for information that is produced by our government (and paid for by taxpayers)? It seems ludicrous to me.
  4. This may be my closet conspiracy theorist coming out, but the Census Bureau seems to be on a wild tear to make it HARDER for our citizens to access data. I say this because of the Bureau’s decision to remove the quick Fact Sheets in the new American FactFinder. The new interface is great for a person accustomed to using data, but for a novice it is horrible. It throws so much information at you at once that I swear they’ve made it less usable (detailed tables anyone?). Every time I look at I dread the intern training I have to do in two weeks. Is this a trend for the Bureau? Concentrate on the data collection programs at the expense of the the compendium approach? If so, it is going to make people turn to easier to use commercial sources or, even worse, crap sources like NationMaster, which takes me back to point 2.
  5. On a purely selfish side, Katharin Peter and I just wrote a book meant to introduce non-data librarians to numeric data in all its glory. The goal of the book is to make numeric data easier for anyone working in reference or instruction. A key source in that book is the Statistical Abstract because of the reasons given above.  I’m convinced the Census Bureau hates me.

Below is a sample letter for sending to your congress people (taken from FGI). Please spread the word! Write your Senators and Representatives!

TO YOUR SENATOR:
The Honorable (full name)
(Room #) (Name) Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator ___________:

TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE:
The Honorable (full name)
(Room #) (Name) House Office Building
United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative __________:

Paragraph 1: Why you are writing and who you are. List your “credentials.” (If you want a response, you must include your name and address, even when using email.)

My name is __________, and I’m a librarian at INSTITUTION which has served the government information needs of the constituents of your Congressional district and state since DATE LIBRARY BECAME A DEPOSITORY. I’m writing because I and many other librarians are deeply concerned that the U.S. Census Bureau’s Budget Estimates for Fiscal Year 2012 calls for the termination of the Statistical Compendia Branch which would mean the elimination of the United States Statistical Abstract and all titles produced by that branch (State and Metropolitan Area Data Book, County and City Data Book, USA Counties, Quick Facts). The library community is deeply upset at the thought of losing access to this important program and urges you to take action to stop this program change.

Paragraph 2: more details about the situation.

The Statistical Abstract of the United States, published annually since 1878, is a key publication for the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), which provides free, public access to government information. Both the print and online versions of the “Stat Abs,” as many librarians affectionately refer to it, are on the FDLP Essential Titles list. It is the first place that many librarians, researchers, students and your constituents(!) look for statistical information, because it compiles a vast amount of information, some of it unpublished and not available anywhere else. The Statistical Abstract also provides a citation for the original source for each table, acting as a guidebook to a huge array of diverse government statistics. The Stat Abs (as well as all of the titles published by the Statistical Compendia Branch!) is a staple of reference librarians and the public for its ease of use, comprehensive content, and as a guidebook to federal statistical sources.

These long published titles — and the federal depositories that distribute it to the American public — are not an earmark, but are critical to the provision of social, economic, and political indicators to the American public and greatly benefit every American in every Congressional district. Without it, librarians, the public and your constituents(!) will waste much valuable time looking for statistics in multiple places and compiling longitudinal data.

Paragraph 3: Close by requesting the action you want taken: a vote for or against a bill, or change in general policy. If a certain bill is involved, cite the correct title or number whenever possible.

Please urge the Department of Commerce to reinstate the budget for the Census Bureau’s Statistical Compendia Branch and the essential, valuable titles that the Branch provides to the public. Many thanks for your time and your service.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME
YOUR POSITION
YOUR INSTITUTION
INSTITUTION/CONTACT INFO

Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians, Day 2

Here are my notes from day 2 of the conference. I had a great time. Because the topic doesn’t quite fit with my usual interests, I probably wouldn’t have gone if I hadn’t had a professional connection. But I’m glad I did. It was helpful to hear speakers talk about librarianship in terms of entrepreneurship. I would probably just call it innovation and innovative thinking, but the idea is to celebrate the rethinking of our work and the way we do our everyday practices.

Katina Strauch: from an unentrepreneur, or the creator of the Charleston Conference

  • They don’t do any marketing for conference; entirely word of a mouth
  • Stages of entrepreneurship:
    • Conviction: young and stupid
    • Idea: create your own conference
    • Concept:
      • the conference captured mood of serials and acquisitions crowd
      • exhibits are held before conference and not during
      • focus on ideas and not products
    • Venture: both conference and journal are limited liability corporations
    • Business:
      • the functioning of the business
      • she talked about the things to avoid and memories of the conference
    • Building a sustainable business:

Running an Information-Services Business Within a Large Global Corporation with Mark Pandick, IBM Market Insights

  • Manages an research services unit within a company (IBM)
  • Challenge for company is having to move into new markets — how get reliable information for workers in developing countries
  • His knowledge services focus includes self-help tools and a knowledge center
  • No physical library – everything they do is virtual
  • Knowledge center has over 20,000 requests a year
  • Relationship managers – helping clients with projects (either topical areas or parts of the business);
  • Each year they start from premise they have no budget – they have to be self funding unit

Open Mic: Using Students to Crowdsource Marketing and Outreach During a Library Renovation with Dean Sullivan and Anne C. Barnhart

  • University of West Georgia
  • Try to get student buy-in with major library renovations
  • Did a “count the computers” contest: Had students count number of current computers and then compare with how many more would be provided by renovation. The put their number in a basket for a drawing.
  • They had fun signs about the renovation
  • Poetry wall
    • A temporary construction wall
    • For national poetry month told students they could write poetry on the wall
    • A lot of the poetry were Bible verses and then became graffiti
  • On another wall they told student orgs they could decorate parts of the wall. Went well except did have some controversial signs
  • How to survive the library renovation project:
    • Asked students to design posters and videos for a contest;
    • Grand prize was two $25 gift certificates to restaurants
    • Didn’t get many entries and not quality they were expecting
  • Lessons learned
    • Students had already given up on the library?
    • Sidewalk chalking might be another approach
    • Someone suggested the book, My Freshman Year, an anthropological study of freshman life

Tim Spalding, LibraryThing: I was eating lunch during his great talk, so no notes.

  • Basically he talked about what start-up is and his journey through the process of creating a start-up company.
  • He was pretty harsh about opacs and library vendors and our subservient relationships with them. He is right.

Lightning Rounds!

I gave a lightning round on our in-house librarian project. It went well (I think) and I had fun giving the talk. I was surprised by the number of people who a) seemed cynical about training an undergraduate student to be a first responder to library questions, and b) thought that a project like this would cause the downfall of the library. Or maybe it was just me.

I have to admit that stopped taking notes after my lightning talk, but here is what I did jot down.

Tim Rogers:

Ingrid Ruffin:

  • Talked about not wanting to be a librarian in a library
  • What are the transferable skills?
  • Creating information products for nonprofit organizations to help them isolate information about the groups they want to support

Angela Swiezy and Mary Gaylord from Eli Lilly:

  • The company needed to become more outcomes-based
  • Their research group did a workshop called “find the entrepreneur in you”
  • Created an interactive website with a bibliography
  • Created an idea board on which employees could post ideas from workshops
  • Entrepreneurs aren’t just risk takers; they are also collaborative and creative workers

Everyone did a great job! It is a good format for delivering ideas and keeping the interest levels high. The lightning rounds were a good challenge for me. I’m accustomed to presenting, but usually I don’t plan out quite as much. The lightning talk goes quickly and it is best to be prepared if you want to get your information out there (and make it entertaining). It is the first time in a while that I’ve written out my presentation and practiced the delivery.

Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians, Day 1

The Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians is a joint effort of Wake Forest University and my own UNCG. I didn’t get a chance to attend many sessions last time it was held (in 2009), but I’m really glad I attended today. The sessions were solid and I love getting to talk with new and old friends.

Below are some rough notes.

Mary Ellen Bates: If you haven’t heard of her (I hadn’t), Bates is a self-employed information services professional (I had never thought about this as a career!). While her session was focused on becoming an entrepreneur (mostly self-employed), most of her points were relevant to anyone who wants to create innovative practice in the library.

  • Three skill sets of info-entrepreneurs: business, professional, and entrepreneurship skills
  • Entrepreneurship is more of a mindset and not as easy to learn, but characteristics are:
    • tolerance for risk and ambiguity
    • 100% client focused; have to constantly learn what clients want now; figuring how services can be geared for your client’s needs (and not what you want to offer)
    • move out of employee mindset – or you are doing this because someone else told you to or a force is compelling you to
    • strategic perspective
    • self-confidence and self-discipline
    • self-starting
  • business skills
    • need to view self as business
      • conference attendance is part of the budget of  your prof development – think about spending money as part of the business
    • be able to close a sale
    • comfort with talking about money
    • think five years out – have a name for your company that is timeless, do not look like a start up
  • professional expertise
    • hone research skills
    • nurture your network of colleagues
    • invest in professional development
    • identify opportunities for adding value to your work (and don’t just do what is required)
  • learn to love uncertainty – embrace ambiguity; being 100% client focused means being open to anything
  • self-management – time management; never go over budget; “perfection is the enemy of good (enough)”
  • cash flow insights – watch your money and don’t use credit; price yourself accordingly
  • keep marketing self; don’t only work for one client
  • form an advisory board – mentors who can and will give feedback
  • marketing plan
    • have tangible goals (eg, I will be invited to so many presentations)
    • do simultaneous efforts (twitter and facebook and linkedin)
    • evaluate marketing plan monthly
    • fully test approaches (don’t just try) – In other words if you want to do something new, go 100% with and fully test the effort to see if it is worth your time. Even if the test is a failure, you at least will have data to know why it was a failure.
  • marketing for introverts: blogging, social media, speak in front of your clients (you gain authority in public speaking), seeing yourself as a brand
  • imposter syndrome
    • take criticism gently
    • look at self as third party
    • learn self appreciation
    • let go of knowing it all
    • don’t talk yourself into thinking everyone is thinking negatively of you
    • fake it until you make it

More information and her slides are available at http://batesinfo.com/extras/

The Library as Partner: Sustaining Relevance in a Collaborative, Student-Focused Technology Center with Heather Lambert, and Christy Groves: Great session. Very interesting and entertaining. I learned a lot not just about the Digital Media Studio, but also some project management ideas. Plus check out the No log (below). Pretty awesome idea!

  • From Middle Tennessee State University
  • Created a Digital Media Studio
  • Space includes a collaborative area with a table and white boards; roving technology assistance and research assistance; technology and research coach appointments
  • They installed open source software on half of the computers
  • Students get to vote on new open source additions
  • In the promotions they don’t talk about specific software but break it down by tasks (movie making, etc)
  • Planning process
    • Got someone from every department to be on committee
    • Communicated to entire library throughout planning process – committees would send out regular updates
    • They used a Gantt chart for timing
  • Training toolkit
    • Created a time when any staff member in library could come and practice making four projects (short 30 min sessions);
    • They put tutorials online and got a site subscription to lynda.com
  • Marketing
    • Had an amazing race with QR codes for the students
    • Also had a fall kickoff with tour of the digital media studio built in (included bowling!)
  • Studio Scribbles: their blog: students write posts with tips on using tools
  • They survey students and librarians regularly. When get feedback, they do a focus group and then change their policies or procedures within four weeks!
  • No log: whenever students have to say no to a patron, they log it in a google spreadsheet. The spreadsheet also includes the follow-up activity to deal with that No!

Business Librarians and Entrepreneurship: Innovative Trends and Characteristics with Elisabeth Leonard and Betsy Clementson: Always fun to see a former professor! Elisabeth Leonard taught my information literacy and library instruction class in grad school. She really set the foundation for my current interest in teaching.

  • They surveyed business librarians in the schools with the top ten entrepreneurship programs.
  • Nine schools participated and 20 librarians answered their survey.
  • They surveyed them to see how they fall within the self-identified categories of innovation adoption: innovator, early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggards. I won’t go into the specifics of the categories as I will link to their presentation once it is up. It does a great job.
  • Most of the respondents characterized themselves as innovators or early adopters, which is different from the way general librarians characterized themselves in a previous study (in that one most were the late majority).
  • It is a small sample but an interesting first study. Would be great to have it expanded to more business librarians or compare across subject areas.
  • Organizations need to have people spanning the  categories especially with more people in the first three groups. This encourages technology adoption.
  • Managers can influence or dampen risk-taking and innovation; they need to provide time and resources to take risks.
  • Managers need to think about the message they are sending when they talk about new changes in organizations. They also need to think about the message they are receiving from employees (are you really hear what they are saying?)

Great first day! Tomorrow is a bit jam-packed with Katina Strauch speaking at 8:15 am. Plus Tim Spalding is the lunch speaker. And I give my first lightning talk. Must go practice!

Teaching time management

I made a huge confession in the time management workshops I taught this past week. Something only a few loved ones know.

I read time management books. Yes, yes, it is crazy. And, yes, yes, they are not well-written generally. It is a self-help sub-genre that can scrape the bottom of the prose barrel. However, at one point in life I was particularly overwhelmed and I picked up my first time management book. And I kept reading.

I enjoy comparing the simple or complex or, frankly, bizarre systems people come up with and then try to market into time management empires. I love it when an author argues that the type of tool you use for time management doesn’t really matter, that what matters is how you use it. Then a year later you see on the shelves a planner or datebook from the same author marked at an inflated price because, of course, his calendar has a special touch! But I digress.

Because I’ve read a lot of time management books and because I’m seen as having good time management skills, I was asked to teach a workshop for our library staff. The ironic part about teaching this class is that I am a huge procrastinator. If you ask my mom about my time management skills, she would probably scoff and say, “Yeah. She manages time…up until the last minute!” Well, she wouldn’t be mean, but she is right. I procrastinate.

So, in reading time management books I’ve learned a few tricks to keep from procrastinating. And really, that’s what time management is about — learning a few tricks to fool yourself into better managing your tasks or your calendar or getting started on projects. When it comes down to your daily life, it doesn’t matter which system you choose for time management as long as you choose the one or parts of the ones that work for you. Think of it like a time management buffet. I like some principles of Getting Things Done by David Allen, but Julie Morgenstern has an interesting approach to thinking about time as space and estimating how long tasks take. For finishing tasks, the Pomodoro Technique is powerful. And then others like the Zen to Done approach that focuses on the three main tasks of the day.

Where people get lost with time management (myself included) is when they start focusing on tools and not techniques. I love trying out a new tool and I’m a big nerd for office supplies, but at some point you have to realize that tool-hopping is productivity porn and not productivity. The tool obsession hit home for me when I wrote a blog post about Evernote. This one post had 1,700 hits in one day (mostly thanks to Evernote tweeting it) and is continually hit by random people every single day. People seem to find it useful. Why? Because they are searching for a tool that will be the magic bullet, and Evernote is close to it, but only if you have an idea of how you can use it productively.

In designing a workshop on time management, I didn’t want to focus on tools because there are plenty to discover and many descriptions of how to use them. What we need to teach are the techniques. How do we think about time and tasks and managing all of it? What are the approaches that are deceptively simple but have tremendous power? I use the project planning activity in GTD (outlined on the slides) all the time and find it to be helpful. I think it has particular application to teaching students how to do research (more on that to come.)

Time management isn’t something you are born with. I didn’t come out of the womb a good time manager. Time management is like writing and critical reading in that these are skills that can be learned. Some people are more attuned to time and some may have an unmistakable talent. But the actual skills of managing time, tasks, and projects can be made a habit, and then you can focus on the most important part … doing!


Goodreads

No data found
Book recommendations, book reviews, quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists

Twitter-rific!

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers